Revision history for PcDriveFormat


Revision [456]

Last edited on 2008-04-07 22:54:40 by admin
Additions:
**Windows XP: NTFS vs. FAT32**
Deletions:
Windows XP: NTFS vs. FAT32

Revision [455]

Edited on 2008-04-07 22:54:25 by admin
Additions:
{{image url="http://kerrygalloway.com/PARIS%20resources/CHART1DISKTHRU.gif" title="Chart 1 - Disk Throughput" alt="Chart 1 - Disk Throughput"}}
Deletions:
{{image url="http://kerrygalloway.com/PARIS%20resources/CHART1DISKTHRU.gif" title="Chart 1 - Disk Throughput" alt="Chart 1 - Disk Throughput" height=200 width=300}}

Revision [454]

Edited on 2008-04-07 22:53:10 by admin
Additions:
{{image url="http://kerrygalloway.com/PARIS%20resources/CHART1DISKTHRU.gif" title="Chart 1 - Disk Throughput" alt="Chart 1 - Disk Throughput" height=200 width=300}}
Deletions:
{{image url="http://kerrygalloway.com/PARIS%20resources/CHART1DISKTHRU.gif" title="Chart 1 - Disk Throughput" alt="Chart 1 - Disk Throughput"}}

Revision [453]

Edited on 2008-04-07 22:52:27 by admin
Additions:
//Testing System:
Western Digital "Special Edition" WD80-JB (Audio Test Drive)//
Deletions:
***
***
Testing System:
Western Digital "Special Edition" WD80-JB (Audio Test Drive)

Revision [452]

Edited on 2008-04-07 22:51:51 by admin
Additions:
//(conclusions at bottom)//
{{image url="http://kerrygalloway.com/PARIS%20resources/CHART1DISKTHRU.gif" title="Chart 1 - Disk Throughput" alt="Chart 1 - Disk Throughput"}}
**Chart 1** shows the disk throughput (MB/sec) performance of the
file systems at the different I/O block settings.
{{image url="http://kerrygalloway.com/PARIS%20resources/CHART2TRACKCOUNT.gif" title="Chart 2 - Estimated Sustainable Track Count" alt="Chart 2 - Estimated Sustainable Track Count 44.1/16"}}
**Chart 2**-TRACK-COUNT.GIF is reinterpretation of the throughput numbers as an
{{image url="http://kerrygalloway.com/PARIS%20resources/CHART3CPUUSAGE.gif" title="Chart 3 - CPU Usage" alt="Chart 3 - CPU Usage"}}
**Chart 3** shows the percentage of CPU consumed at maximum
''__From the results, it appears that the choice of NTFS/FAT32 comes down to a
NTFS.__''
''__The cluster format size appears to have a negligible effect on performance,
so your best bet is to take the system default.__''
''__Both 64K and 128K block sizes offer equivalent performance, so either is
__''
Deletions:
{{image url="http://kerrygalloway.com/PARIS%20resources/CHART1DISKTHRU.gif" title="text" alt="text"}}
//Chart 1 shows the disk throughput (MB/sec) performance of the
file systems at the different I/O block settings.//
CHART2-TRACK-COUNT.GIF is reinterpretation of the throughput numbers as an
CHART3-CPU-USAGE.GIF shows the percentage of CPU consumed at maximum
From the results, it appears that the choice of NTFS/FAT32 comes down to a
NTFS.
The cluster format size appears to have a negligible effect on performance,
so your best bet is to take the system default.
Both 64K and 128K block sizes offer equivalent performance, so either is

Revision [451]

Edited on 2008-04-07 22:46:31 by admin
Additions:
=====Benchmarking Drive Formats for PARIS=====
----
{{image url="http://kerrygalloway.com/PARIS%20resources/CHART1DISKTHRU.gif" title="text" alt="text"}}
//Chart 1 shows the disk throughput (MB/sec) performance of the
file systems at the different I/O block settings.//
Deletions:
Benchmarking Drive Formats for PARIS
{{image url="http://kerrygalloway.com/PARIS%20resources/CHART1DISKTHRU.gif" title="text" alt="text"}}Chart 1 shows the disk throughput (MB/sec) performance of the
file systems at the different I/O block settings.

Revision [450]

Edited on 2008-04-07 22:45:23 by admin
Additions:
{{image url="http://kerrygalloway.com/PARIS%20resources/CHART1DISKTHRU.gif" title="text" alt="text"}}Chart 1 shows the disk throughput (MB/sec) performance of the
Deletions:
CHART1-DISK-THRU.GIF shows the disk throughput (MB/sec) performance of the

Revision [446]

The oldest known version of this page was created on 2008-04-07 22:38:57 by admin
Valid XHTML :: Valid CSS: :: Powered by WikkaWiki